Short of the Week


Disturbing look at the frustrations of a man and son against nameless aggression.

A simulated camcorder shot opens the film. Young thugs are on videoing spree, filming their exploits as they beat on an outnumbered youth. Cut to an overhead of a quiet suburban community. A man, the boy’s father, is coming home from work. He will soon have a confrontation with the thugs as well. Facing unprovoked and unreasonable violence, the father and son must choose individually to stay themselves or to act—their already rocky relationship and perceptions of the other, dependent on how they choose.

That is the setup for Soft, a short film which is lean, yet inventive and diverse in technique—a true coming out for a rising star, British writer/director Simon Ellis. Shot on film over 5 days for the sum of 50,000 pounds, the short film is the product of a sponsorship by the UK Film Council and Film4 via their Cinema Extreme program, which identifies British film talent and supports their ability to step up to feature films by first tackling a professional short (edit 12/8/2010: R.I.P UK Film Council).

Based on the film’s reception, that decision to invest in Mr. Ellis seems wise. Soft was the recipient of the 2008 International Jury Prize at Sundance, as well as Best of the Fest at the ’07 Palm Springs Short Film Fest. What Soft accomplishs to garner such acclaim is multi-fold and seemingly contradictory: the short film is both novel and yet relatable, timeless in its themes yet extremely topical, and while so much of the film is about relationships and emotions, its defining moment is a thunderbolt of shocking action.

The reactions of the father and son to the violence initiated by the young hooligans is at the heart of the film’s allure, and it is a complex conflict. Simultaneously playing out on a physical as well as ethical level it defies easy resolution or second-guessing on the audience’s part. Moreover, the conflict is triangular—the man and son up against nameless aggression, but also the man and son versus each other, setting up a novel premise for the short film, that is yet still universal. After all, who has not confronted bullying?

Tension is masterfully manipulated through a slow burn pacing that pushes the film to its 13min runtime. In his 15 prior shorts Ellis had yet to break the 10min mark in length, and I generally agree with him in that doctrine, yet in an interview, Ellis responds “In my opinion, most short films are almost always too long but I felt this one needed room to breathe.Soft benefits from that choice not only in atmospherics, but also in developing its characters.

The 13min runtime allows for a second stellar aspect of the film to shine through, which is its acting. The tension that is central to the film is largely generated from the performances—liberal employment of extreme facial close-ups that convey subtle notes of apprehension, dawning comprehension and resolve, which serve to move the film forward. It is rare that a short film so wholly relies on performance and character development as Soft does, but so much of the story is interior. It is truly the change and growth in its characters outlook and reactions which define the story, the explicit action is merely the consummation of information already conveyed.

Finally the film is topical, in a way that surely has benefited its reception in the UK. Having spent some time in London over the last few years, I can attest to a rising hysteria amongst media outlets and evidently the public at large, over the rise of “Hoodies”. Ellis definitely plays off of existing fears to great effect by imagining a villainous force of randomly violent, hip-hop inspired youth to serve as the catalyst for his story. Histories of Hoodie-hysteria often trace the rise of the phenomena to the controversial use of CCTV cameras on London’s streets and public places. The high angle shot which opens and closes the film is obviously meant to evoke this current reality of constant surveillance, and I imagine the Hoodie’s use of a camcorder in taping their sprees is in some way imagined as a rebellious rebuke of this policy as well. Yet while the hoodies of the film are villains, thugs delighting in the delivering of abuse, I read a moral to the film that ultimately is dismissive of the threat of Hoodies—yes there exist bullies and maladjusted youngsters, but they are merely bullies, not a sinister new force. The real threat is the disconnect of a society from its youth. Elders chide and judge without understanding, while the youngsters scoff at their hypocrisy. This crisis is happening in the homes of communities, not on the streets.

Edit 12/08/2010: A new play link has been added, and some content of the article has been changed for clarity.

Co-Founder of Short of the Week, Sondhi lives in Brooklyn working as a Curator for Vimeo. Follow his musings on online video, direct distribution and branded content: @jasondhi.
  • confused dude

    why can’t i watch this for free?

  • Jason Sondhi

    We had a link for a while on DailyMotion, but then it got taken down, and haven’t found another one. If you have success, drop us a line.

  • The Un-Gone « Short of the Week

    [...] depictions of the country (V for Vendetta and Children of Men spring to mind, must be the cameras). Ultimately these details do not further the plot, but they provide the kind of nuance that turns [...]

  • Carl

    i found this…

    the only problem it’s that fucking traduction

  • Jason Sondhi

    Thanks for dropping a link. Yeah the film is dubbed in a foreign language w/o subtitles. We’ve got a pretty diverse audience though, what language are we listening to?

    The transcode is wonky as well with a messed up aspect ratio. This is a great film, one that is justly remembered as among the handful of truly stellar international shorts of the last 5 years. If you can get your hands on the Cinema 16: World Short Films DVD which this one plays on you won’t regret it.

  • Jason Sondhi

    Well thanks to Carl, I decided to look again and found that a seemingly legit version of the film has come online in the last couple of weeks thanks to Network Ireland TV, which has placed the film in its YouTube Channel. Watch this film!

  • Jason Sondhi

    Director Simon Ellis was good enough to get in touch, and let us know that the aspect ratio was F****d up. He gave us a new link, so check it out proper this time. And if you still haven’t seen this, you need to get up on that.

  • Soft – Short film :: GIANT STORIES/TINY SCREENS

    [...] this was apparently made with £50,000. But, it’s a good story. Soft, by Simon [...]

  • Short Films | Happy Father's Day!

    [...] Soft: dir. Simon Ellis | 12min | UK— Disturbing look at the frustrations of a man and son against nameless aggression. [...]

  • Frankie by Darren Thornton | Short Film

    [...] The Most Beautiful Man in the World, certainly represents a poetic end of this spectrum, while Soft, which we reviewed but is no longer online, takes it to its confrontational core. Mention of Connor [...]

  • lindangita

    Great movie! I like the fact that the film also focus on the
    violence in the relationship between the father and the son. The end of
    the film surprised and shocked me as much as it saddened me (I mean I
    was sad because of what happened to the characters) : violence had the
    final word and the father’s frustration is amphasized by the son’s
    reactions. The actors are perfect, great directory.
    Thank you for sharing.

  • Liam

    It’s a wonder that more of my mates don’t go rockets on bullies like that. The US is right to own guns. They should be allowed to use them more. Perhaps the laws will change here. In my mind we have become so civilized that we have lost our balls and our common sense. I’m glad he beat the shit out of that bloke.

  • Simon

    One of the best short movies I’ve seen. Shockingly realistic. I thought the gang were portrayed very accurately. I’m sure many of us have experienced or seen varying levels of behaviour like this on the streets of England. It’s sad to think there are youths like this. The acting is of a high standard and helps create an atmosphere of tension. It’s a good movie for generating discussion on several topics. What would you do? Whilst I wouldn’t normally condone violence, I thought it was an appropriate outcome!

  • LotF

    You do realise that if you granted anyone access to guns, it would include gangs like these? It would make things worse. Also, “the US is right to own guns” is an funny way of putting it, given that most – if not all – countries in the world own guns.

  • Anonymous

    This is a film about a father losing control of his son because he is incapable of protecting him. But who from? The bullies? No.
    The child has to protect himself from his father who poses the real threat to his future. Cowardice is a dangerous thing. I think the undercurrent of emotional violence here; of telling a son that he should not fight because you cannot fight is brilliantly done.
    Here here.

  • John Abraham

    Very Well taken ! The emotional tension of father & son are portrayed in a beautiful way, which makes the audience hooked and raises the curiosity to know what will happen next. Thoroughly enjoyed every minute of the short film !